@article {1984671,
	title = {Beyond Relevance and towards Usefulness: Implications of Academic Perspective Taking},
	journal = {British Journal of Management},
	year = {2023},
	month = {2023},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Bass,A Erin}
}
@article {1982301,
	title = {Beyond Relevance and towards Usefulness: Implications of Academic Perspective Taking},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2022},
	address = {Hawaii},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Bass,A Erin}
}
@article {1982336,
	title = {That{\textquoteright}s Interesting! Or Is It? On the Incommensurability of Academic and Practitioner Interests},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	address = {Boston, MA},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D}
}
@article {1982356,
	title = {Too Much of a Good Thing? Grit and the Proliferation of Positive Constructs},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	address = {Orlando, FL},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D}
}
@article {1974151,
	title = {An Assessment of the Magnitude of Effect Sizes: Evidence from 30 Years of Meta-Analysis in Management},
	journal = {Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016},
	abstract = {This study compiles information from more than 250 meta-analyses conducted over the past 30 years to assess the magnitude of reported effect sizes in the OB/HR literatures. Our analysis revealed an average uncorrected effect of r = .227 and an average corrected effect of ρ = .278 (SDρ = .140). Based upon the distribution of effect sizes we report, Cohen{\textquoteright}s effect size benchmarks are not appropriate for use in OB/HR research as they over-estimate the actual breakpoints between small, medium, and large effects. We also assessed the average statistical power reported in meta-analytic conclusions and found substantial evidence that the majority of primary studies in the management literature are statistically underpowered. Finally, we investigated the impact of the file drawer problem in meta-analyses and our findings indicate that the file drawer problem is not a significant concern for meta-analysts. We conclude by discussing various implications of this study for OB/HR researchers.},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Steel,Piers and Cred{\'e},Marcus}
}
@article {1982371,
	title = {The 3 R{\textquoteright}s of Management Research: Do Rigor and Relevance Lead to References?},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015},
	address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Tuggle,Christopher and Luthans,Fred}
}
@article {1982431,
	title = {Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: What about the Follower?},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013},
	address = {Houston, TX},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Jeung,Wonho and Harms,P D and Paterson,Ted}
}
@article {1982436,
	title = {Exploring the Relationships of Human, Social, and Psychological Capital},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013},
	address = {Houston, TX},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Jeung,Wonho and Luthans,Fred and Harms,P D and Paterson,Ted}
}
@article {1982446,
	title = {The Meta of All Metas: 30 Years of Meta-Analysis Reviewed},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	address = {San Diego, CA},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Cred{\'e},Marcus}
}
@article {1982456,
	title = {Is it Normal to Lead? Personality, Prototypes, and Leader Emergence},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011},
	address = {Chicago, IL},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Harms,P D and Paterson,Ted and Wood,Dustin}
}
@article {1974116,
	title = {Beyond Relevance and towards Usefulness: Implications of Academic Perspective Taking},
	journal = {British Journal of Management},
	month = {2023 In Press},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Paterson,Ted and Harms,P D and Bass,A Erin}
}