01853nas a2200169 4500008004100000245008700041210006900128260004200197520122100239653001501460653000801475100002001483700002101503700001901524700001701543856012301560 2022 eng d00aDo Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement?0 aDo Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal NonCompliance Sc aCopenhagen, Denmark, Dec. 2022c20223 aTo better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior. However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs.10aAccounting10aBIS1 aMarshall, Byron1 aShadbad, Forough1 aCurry, Michael1 aBiros, David u/biblio/do-measures-security-compliance-intent-equal-non-compliance-scenario-agreement01771nas a2200169 4500008004100000245008700041210006900128260004200197520122100239653001501460653000801475100002001483700002101503700001901524700001701543856004101560 2022 eng d00aDo Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement?0 aDo Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal NonCompliance Sc aCopenhagen, Denmark, Dec. 2022c20223 aTo better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior. However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs.10aAccounting10aBIS1 aMarshall, Byron1 aShadbad, Forough1 aCurry, Michael1 aBiros, David uhttps://aisel.aisnet.org/wisp2022/1900502nas a2200121 4500008004100000245008900041210006900130260000900199653000800208100002100216700001700237856012600254 2021 eng d00aDoes Technostress Triger Insider Threat? A conceptual Model and Mitigation Solutions0 aDoes Technostress Triger Insider Threat A conceptual Model and M c202110aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBiros, David u/biblio/does-technostress-triger-insider-threat-conceptual-model-and-mitigation-solutions00512nas a2200121 4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260000900205653000800214100002100222700001700243856013000260 2021 eng d00aUnderstanding Employee Information Security Policy Compliance from Role Theory Perspective0 aUnderstanding Employee Information Security Policy Compliance fr c202110aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBiros, David u/biblio/understanding-employee-information-security-policy-compliance-role-theory-perspective00529nas a2200133 4500008004100000245008900041210006900130260000900199653000800208100002100216700001700237700001700254856012400271 2020 eng d00aA Qualitative Approach to Understand Unintentional Information Security Misbehaviors0 aQualitative Approach to Understand Unintentional Information Sec c202010aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBaham, Corey1 aBiros, David u/biblio/qualitative-approach-understand-unintentional-information-security-misbehaviors00496nas a2200121 4500008004100000245008600041210006900127260000900196653000800205100002100213700001700234856012300251 2020 eng d00aTechnostress and its Influence on Employee Information Security Policy Compliance0 aTechnostress and its Influence on Employee Information Security  c202010aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBiros, David u/biblio/technostress-and-its-influence-employee-information-security-policy-compliance00480nas a2200121 4500008004100000245007900041210006900120260000900189653000800198100002100206700001700227856011400244 2019 eng d00aDeveloping an Unintentional Information Security Misbehavior Scale (UISMS)0 aDeveloping an Unintentional Information Security Misbehavior Sca c201910aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBiros, David u/biblio/developing-unintentional-information-security-misbehavior-scale-uisms00487nas a2200133 4500008004100000245006800041210006600109260000900175653000800184100002100192700001700213700001900230856010400249 2019 eng d00aExamining Technostress on Employees Security-related Behaviors0 aExamining Technostress on Employees Securityrelated Behaviors c201910aBIS1 aShadbad, Forough1 aBiros, David1 aSharma, Madhav u/biblio/examining-technostress-employees-security-related-behaviors