00508nas a2200145   4500008004100000245005500041210005500096260003000151653001700181653001400198100002300212700001600235700001700251856009400268       2023                        eng d00aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization0 aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization  aStorrs, Connecticutc202310aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/morality-appraisals-consumer-responsibilization-000598nas a2200145   4500008004100000245010900041210006900150260000900219653001700228653001400245100002300259700001600282700001700298856013700315       2022                        eng d00aThe (Ir)Responsible American Consumer:  Examining Morality and Responsibilization for Armed Self-Defense0 aIrResponsible American Consumer Examining Morality and Responsib  c202210aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/irresponsible-american-consumer-examining-morality-and-responsibilization-armed-self-defense00525nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260000900182653001700191653001400208100002300222700001600245700001700261856010100278       2019                        eng d00aAmerican Consumers' Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms0 aAmerican Consumers Understandings of the Right to Consume Firear  c201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/american-consumers-understandings-right-consume-firearms00545nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260002700182653001700209653001400226100002300240700001600263700001700279856010300296       2019                        eng d00aAmerican Consumers' Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms0 aAmerican Consumers Understandings of the Right to Consume Firear  aMontreal, Canadac201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/american-consumers-understandings-right-consume-firearms-000611nas a2200145   4500008004100000245012500041210006900166260000900235653001700244653001400261100002300275700001600298700001700314856013400331       2019                        eng d00aRelating American's Responses to the Marketization of Armed Self-Defense to their Understandings of the Second Amendment0 aRelating Americans Responses to the Marketization of Armed SelfD  c201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/relating-americans-responses-marketization-armed-self-defense-their-understandings-second02006nas a2200157   4500008004000000245005500040210005500095260001800150520150100168653001701669653001401686100002301700700001601723700001701739856009201756       0                           engd00aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization0 aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization  c2023 In Press3 aAbstract: In recent decades, U.S. “pro-gun” lobbying groups, politicians, courts, and market actors have sought to responsibilize U.S. consumers to use firearms to address the societal problem of crime. These responsibilization efforts center an interpretation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms as an entitlement for individuals to engage in armed protection from criminals. Using interview and online discussion data, this research investigates consumers’ responses to responsibilization for this morally fraught set of behaviors, and the role of consumers’ various understandings of the right to bear arms in these responses. Findings show that acceptance of responsibilization is a matter of proportionality; consumers accept responsibilization for a proportion of specific armed protection scenarios and reject it for the remainder. Acceptance is determined by their appraisals of the morality of the responsibilization sub-processes (Giesler & Veresiu 2014). Consumers’ understanding of the constitutional right serves as a heuristic in these appraisals, with some understandings leading consumers to accept responsibilization across a much larger proportion of scenarios than others. Contributions include illustrating response to responsibilization as a proportionality; illuminating consumers’ active role in appraising responsibilizing efforts; and demonstrating how some consumers come to understand a responsibilized behavior as a moral entitlement.<br><br>10aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/morality-appraisals-consumer-responsibilization