01853nas a2200169   4500008004100000245010900041210006900150260000900219300001200228490000700240520123400247653001701481100001601498700001501514700002301529856013101552       2010                        eng d00aSupplier-Supplier Relationships in Buyer-Supplier-Supplier Triads: Implications for Supplier Performance0 aSupplierSupplier Relationships in BuyerSupplierSupplier Triads I  c2010  a115-1230 v283 aA growing number of studies and evidence from industries suggest that, besides managing the relationship with its suppliers, a buyer needs to proactively manage the relationships between those suppliers. In a buyer–supplier–supplier relationship triad, the buyer, as the contracting entity, influences the suppliers’ behaviors and the relationship between them. By considering the relationships in such a triad, we are able to gain a richer and more realistic perspective of buyer–supplier relationships. In this study, our goal is to examine supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads, focusing on how such relationships impact the supplier performance. We frame the supplier–supplier relationship as co-opetition—one in which competing suppliers work together to meet the buyer's requirements. We investigate the role of the buyer on such relationships, and how the buyer and co-opetitive supplier–supplier relationships affect supplier performance. We find mixed empirical support for our hypotheses. However, we are able to demonstrate the dynamics of supplier–supplier co-opetition in the buyer–supplier–supplier triad. We point out the need for further studies in this area.10aSupply Chain1 aWu, Zhaohui1 aChoi, T.Y.1 aRungtusanatham, M.  u/biblio/supplier-supplier-relationships-buyer-supplier-supplier-triads-implications-supplier-001770nas a2200193   4500008004100000245011100041210006900152260000900221300001200230490000700242520107900249653001701328100002301345700001701368700002601385700001601411700001701427856013201444       2003                        eng d00aSurvey Research in Production/Operations Management: Historical Analyses and Opportunities for Improvement0 aSurvey Research in ProductionOperations Management Historical An  c2003  a475-4880 v213 aOur paper provides a comprehensive assessment of 285 survey research articles in operations management (OM), published between 1980 and 2000. Six OM journals are included in this study; they are, in alphabetical order: Decision Sciences (DS), International Journal of Operations & Production Management (IJOPM), International Journal of Production Research (IJPR), Journal of Operations Management (JOM), Management Science (MS), and Production and Operations Management (POM). In this paper, we reflect upon the state and evolution of survey research in the OM discipline across a 21-year time span and the contribution of OM journals that have published these studies. Major changes have occurred in the last 5 years of our sampling period, and two topics stood out as showing fastest ascendancy to prominence—operations strategy and supply chain management. Furthermore, over the years, the Journal of Operations Management appears to have been publishing more survey research articles and a greater variety of OM topics compared to the other five journals in our study.10aSupply Chain1 aRungtusanatham, M.1 aChoi, T., Y.1 aHollingsworth, D., G.1 aWu, Zhaohui1 aCipriano, F.  u/biblio/survey-research-productionoperations-management-historical-analyses-and-opportunities-0