00600nas a2200145   4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260000900205653003200214100002600246700001800272700002200290700001600312856012600328       2021                        eng d00aRe-examining Constraints And Ventures' Learning: The Case Of Business Accelerator Programs0 aReexamining Constraints And Ventures Learning The Case Of Busine  c202110aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aGerasymenko, Violetta1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aArthurs, Jonathan1 aChoi, Yohan  u/biblio/re-examining-constraints-and-ventures-learning-case-business-accelerator-programs00489nas a2200121   4500008004100000245011400041210006900155260000900224653003200233100001600265700002000281856006600301       2021                        eng d00aStanding Ground? The Influences of Knowledge Diversity and Technology Opportunity on Generative Appropriation0 aStanding Ground The Influences of Knowledge Diversity and Techno  c202110aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aChoi, Yohan1 aBarden, Jeffrey  uhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S136391962150076601675nas a2200133   4500008004100000245010300041210006900144260000900213520112500222653003201347100002001379700001601399856012601415       2021                        eng d00aSwinging for the Fences? Payroll, Performance and Risk Behavior in the Major League Baseball Draft0 aSwinging for the Fences Payroll Performance and Risk Behavior in  c20213 aThis study examines the way competitive advantage and organization performance mediate the effect of potential slack – externally-available resources – on organization risk behavior in Major League Baseball’s amateur draft. It tests the hypotheses that local market munificence provides payroll advantage and increases on-field performance and that payroll disadvantage and poor performance increase teams’ likelihood of selecting riskier high school players instead of college players. Consistent with resource deprivation theory, results suggest that payroll disadvantage promotes risk-taking; however, on-field success encourages risk-taking early in the draft. Indeed, pick number appears to have a U-shape relationship with risk-taking where winning increases confidence earlier in the draft and low stakes promote risk-seeking later. This study contributes to the literature by suggesting that input-based and outcome-based reference metrics have different effects on risk behavior and that managerial hubris may influence risk behavior through information availability rather than having a general effect.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aBarden, Jeffrey1 aChoi, Yohan  u/biblio/swinging-fences-payroll-performance-and-risk-behavior-major-league-baseball-draft00661nas a2200157   4500008004100000245011700041210006900158260002200227653003200249100002200281700001800303700001600321700002000337700001600357856013000373       2017                        eng d00aThe Impact of Bankruptcy on Competitors: How Technology Overlap and Diversification Affect Value Redistribution.0 aImpact of Bankruptcy on Competitors How Technology Overlap and D  aAtlanta, GAc201710aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aArthurs, Jonathan1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aChoi, Yohan1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aJoshi, Amol  u/biblio/impact-bankruptcy-competitors-how-technology-overlap-and-diversification-affect-value01576nas a2200169   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260000900212520092600221653003201147100002201179700001801201700001601219700002001235700001601255856013501271       2017                        eng d00aImpact of Bankruptcy on Rivals: How Tech Overlap and Diversification Affects Value Redistribution0 aImpact of Bankruptcy on Rivals How Tech Overlap and Diversificat  c20173 aPrior research on bankruptcy proposes two potential outcomes for a bankrupt firm’s industry rivals: a contagion effect wherein rivals’ stock prices decline, and a competitive effect wherein rivals benefit from a competitor’s decline. Although empirical evidence substantiates the contagion effect, existing studies do not consistently account for the competitive effect. We develop and test theory explaining how the degree of technology overlap and diversification strategy of competitors influences the severity of the contagion effect and the expected occurrence of the competitive effect among rivals. We find that greater technology overlap among a bankrupt firm and its competitors exacerbates the contagion effect. Furthermore, competitors with higher unrelated diversification are more susceptible to contagion, while competitors with higher related diversification benefit more from a rival’s bankruptcy.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aArthurs, Jonathan1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aChoi, Yohan1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aJoshi, Amol  u/biblio/impact-bankruptcy-rivals-how-tech-overlap-and-diversification-affects-value-redistribution00634nas a2200145   4500008004000000245011300040210006900153260001800222653003200240100001800272700001600290700002500306700002100331856013600352       0                           engd00aOne Man's Death Is Another Man's Bread: The Effect of CEO Sudden Death on Competitors' Strategic Investments0 aOne Mans Death Is Another Mans Bread The Effect of CEO Sudden De  c2023 In Press10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aChoi, Yohan1 aPark, Haemin, Dennis1 aKwon, Jung, Hyun  u/biblio/one-mans-death-another-mans-bread-effect-ceo-sudden-death-competitors-strategic-investments