01154nas a2200145 4500008004100000245008100041210006900122260000900191520062300200653001200823100001900835700001700854700002400871856011300895 2020 eng d00aGovernance Changes through Shareholder Initiatives: The Case of Proxy Access0 aGovernance Changes through Shareholder Initiatives The Case of P c20203 aWe study a regulatory change that led to over 300 shareholder proposals to instate proxy access and more than 250 firms adopting proxy access from 2012 to 2016. The firms expected to benefit most from proxy access have the most positive market reaction to receiving a proposal, but adoptions are not concentrated at these firms. We find that proposing and voting shareholders do not discriminate between firms that would or would not benefit, and that management resists proxy access at the firms that stand to benefit most. This process results in the concentration of adoptions at large, already well-governed firms.10aFinance1 aBhandari, Tara1 aIliev, Peter1 aKalodimos, Jonathan u/biblio/governance-changes-through-shareholder-initiatives-case-proxy-access00529nas a2200133 4500008004100000245008000041210006900121260000900190653001200199100002400211700001900235700001700254856012400271 2017 eng d00aProgress in Understanding Proxy Access and the Shareholder Proposal Process0 aProgress in Understanding Proxy Access and the Shareholder Propo c201710aFinance1 aKalodimos, Jonathan1 aBhandari, Tara1 aIliev, Peter uhttps://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/01/03/progress-in-understanding-proxy-access-and-the-shareholder-proposal-process/00523nas a2200133 4500008004100000245007600041210006900117260000900186653001200195100002400207700001700231700001900248856012200267 2015 eng d00aPublic versus Private Provision of Governance: The Case of Proxy Access0 aPublic versus Private Provision of Governance The Case of Proxy  c201510aFinance1 aKalodimos, Jonathan1 aIliev, Peter1 aBhandari, Tara uhttp://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2015/10/01/public-versus-private-provision-of-governance-the-case-of-proxy-access/