00651nas a2200169   4500008004100000245011400041210006900155260000900224300001200233490000700245653001500252653001700267100001900284700002200303700002100325856013500346       2017                        eng d00aA tale of two formats: Direct comparison of matching situational and behavior description interview questions0 atale of two formats Direct comparison of matching situational an  c2017  a167-1770 v2710aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aHowes, Satoris1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.1 aHuffcutt, A., I.  u/biblio/tale-two-formats-direct-comparison-matching-situational-and-behavior-description-interview01408nas a2200181   4500008004100000245008300041210006900124260000900193300001200202490000700214520085000221653001501071653001701086100001901103700002201122700001901144856006301163       2016                        eng d00aBehavioral cues as indicators of deception in structured employment interviews0 aBehavioral cues as indicators of deception in structured employm  c2016  a119-1310 v243 aTwo studies were conducted to examine the use of behavioral cues to identify deception within structured interviews. In Study 1, participants engaged in mock interviews in which they were instructed to lie on specific questions that varied by person. Trained coders evaluated the presence and extent of deception cues in each videotaped response. Nine cues predicted responses as expected, demonstrating that, with careful scrutiny, it is possible to detect deception. In Study 2, participants, either informed or uninformed regarding deception cues, viewed five interviews and evaluated responses as being honest or deceptive. Participants also rated overall interview performance. Participants were unable to accurately distinguish lies from truths. Nevertheless, performance ratings differed on the basis of rater perceptions of truthfulness.10aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aHowes, Satoris1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.1 aWaples, C., J.  uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijsa.1213500655nas a2200169   4500008004100000245012500041210006900166260000900235300001200244490000700256653001500263653001700278100002100295700001900316700002200335856012800357       2014                        eng d00aMoving forward indirectly: Reanalyzing the validity of employment interviews with indirect range restriction methodology0 aMoving forward indirectly Reanalyzing the validity of employment  c2014  a297-3090 v2210aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aHuffcutt, A., I.1 aHowes, Satoris1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.  u/biblio/moving-forward-indirectly-reanalyzing-validity-employment-interviews-indirect-range00614nas a2200169   4500008004100000245009100041210006900132260000900201300001200210490000600222653001500228653001700243100002100260700001900281700002200300856012200322       2014                        eng d00aMulti-stage artifact correction: An illustration with structured employment interviews0 aMultistage artifact correction An illustration with structured e  c2014  a548-5530 v710aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aHuffcutt, A., I.1 aHowes, Satoris1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.  u/biblio/multi-stage-artifact-correction-illustration-structured-employment-interviews00618nas a2200169   4500008004100000245009000041210006900131260000900200300001200209490000700221653001500228653001700243100002100260700001900281700002200300856012600322       2013                        eng d00aEmployment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structure and format0 aEmployment interview reliability New metaanalytic estimates by s  c2013  a264-2760 v2110aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aHuffcutt, A., I.1 aHowes, Satoris1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.  u/biblio/employment-interview-reliability-new-meta-analytic-estimates-structure-and-format00617nas a2200181   4500008004100000245007500041210006900116260000900185300001200194490000600206653001500212653001700227100001900244700002200263700002000285700001900305856011100324       2010                        eng d00aQuestionable defeats and discounted victories for Likert rating scales0 aQuestionable defeats and discounted victories for Likert rating   c2010  a477-4800 v310aManagement10aOSU-Cascades1 aWaples, C., J.1 aWeyhrauch, W., S.1 aConnell, A., R.1 aHowes, Satoris  u/biblio/questionable-defeats-and-discounted-victories-likert-rating-scales