00643nas a2200145   4500008004100000245013800041210006900179260000900248653003200257100002000289700001600309700002000325700002500345856012700370       2019                        eng d00aCounteracting Globalization's Skeptics: How Diasporas Influence the Internationalization Preferences of Minority Entrepreneurs' Firms0 aCounteracting Globalizations Skeptics How Diasporas Influence th  c201910aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aInouye, Todd, M1 aJoshi, Amol1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aRobinson, Jeffrey, A  u/biblio/counteracting-globalizations-skeptics-how-diasporas-influence-internationalization02442nas a2200181   4500008004100000020002200041245007300063210006900136260002500205300001200230520179400242653003202036100002502068700001602093700003002109700002002139856010102159       2019                        eng d  a978 1 78643 600 900aUrban Innovation:  At the nexus of entrepreneurship and urban policy0 aUrban Innovation At the nexus of entrepreneurship and urban poli  aCheltenham, UKc2019  a129-1443 aWe define urban innovation as the development of long-lasting transformations in urban communities, neighborhoods, and cities. In our proposed framework, urban innovation is driven by two overarching principles: social inclusion and transformation. Inclusion allows for interaction across social groups and benefits society by reducing socio-economic separation through fostering stronger, and even new, relationships in the community. Transformation means deep-seated change that remodels the mindset and creates new change agents. These principles enable us to isolate innovative activities that are small and incremental, from urban innovations that have the potential to impact the economy and society in major ways. We identify three distinct types of transformative and inclusive policy innovations used in the urban innovation context: market creating, market integration, and market incentivizing. We also present three types of business model innovations that work within these innovations: social entrepreneurship, technology and innovation parks, and venture accelerators. We further categorize the social entrepreneurship business model into sustainable or triple bottom line businesses, social enterprises, micro-finance organizations and benefits corporations/B-Corps. We highlight specific examples of these policy and business model innovations from around the world to illustrate how and why urban innovations are essential for economic growth and social development in rapidly urbanizing cities. We also present several promising avenues for new research on urban innovation to guide scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in more systematically studying the phenomenon and in making strategic decisions about critical issues related to future of the world’s cities.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aRobinson, Jeffrey, A1 aJoshi, Amol1 aVickerie-Dearman, Lutisha1 aInouye, Todd, M  u/biblio/urban-innovation-nexus-entrepreneurship-and-urban-policy00542nas a2200133   4500008004100000245007400041210006900115260002100184653003200205100001600237700002000253700002500273856011000298       2017                        eng d00aGlass Ceiling Effects for Minority and Women Technology Entrepreneurs0 aGlass Ceiling Effects for Minority and Women Technology Entrepre  aNewark, NJc201710aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aJoshi, Amol1 aInouye, Todd, M1 aRobinson, Jeffrey, A  u/biblio/glass-ceiling-effects-minority-and-women-technology-entrepreneurs01735nas a2200169   4500008004100000245017200041210006900213260000900282300009600291490000700387520095000394653003201344100001601376700002001392700002501412856012801437       2017                        eng d00aHow does agency workforce diversity influence Federal R&D funding of minority and women technology entrepreneurs? An analysis of the SBIR and STTR programs, 2001–20110 aHow does agency workforce diversity influence Federal RD funding  c2017  a499-519 (Winner of the Best Paper Prize for the Special Issue on Minority Entrepreneurship)0 v503 aU.S. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs provide Federal research and development (R&D) grants to technology ventures. We explore how grantor demographic diversity explains why demographically diverse grantees experience different odds for successfully transitioning from initial to follow-on R&D grants. We empirically analyze 52,126 Phase I SBIR/STTR awards granted by 11 Federal agencies (2001-2011). We find a positive association between agency workforce diversity and Phase II funding for Phase I grantees, but minority and women technology entrepreneurs are less likely to receive this funding than their non-minority and male counterparts. Agencies valuing workforce ethnic diversity or leveraging gender homophily positively influence the likelihood of women technology entrepreneurs obtaining Phase II funding. We discuss evidence-based implications for policy and practice.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aJoshi, Amol1 aInouye, Todd, M1 aRobinson, Jeffrey, A  u/biblio/how-does-agency-workforce-diversity-influence-federal-rd-funding-minority-and-women