00739nas a2200265   4500008004100000245003600041210003600077260000900113300001200122490000800134653001500142100002000157700001500177700002200192700001900214700002300233700002000256700002000276700002000296700002400316700002100340700002100361710001800382856007300400       2020                        eng d00aCreative destruction in science0 aCreative destruction in science  c2020  a291-3090 v16110aManagement1 aTierney, Warren1 aHardy, Jay1 aEbersole, Charlie1 aLeavitt, Keith1 aViagnola, Domenico1 aClemente, Elena1 aGordon, Michael1 aDreber, Anna, A1 aJohannesson, Magnus1 aPfeiffer, Thomas1 aUhlmann, Eric, L1 aEmptyAuthNode  u/biblio/creative-destruction-science00651nas a2200157   4500008004100000245012100041210006900162260000900231653001500240100002400255700002700279700001900306700001100325700002100336856013600357       2019                        eng d00aWhy so Serious? Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and a Sense of Humor are Psychologically Incompatible.0 aWhy so Serious Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and  c201910aManagement1 aYam, Kai, Chi (Sam)1 aBarnes, Christopher, M1 aLeavitt, Keith1 aWei, W1 aUhlmann, Eric, L  u/biblio/why-so-serious-experimental-and-field-evidence-morality-and-sense-humor-are-psychologically00633nas a2200145   4500008004100000245012100041210006900162260001800231653001500249100001800264700002700282700001900309700002100328856013800349       2018                        eng d00aWhy so Serious? Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and a Sense of Humor are Psychologically Incompatible.0 aWhy so Serious Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and  aChicagoc201810aManagement1 aYam, Kai, Chi1 aBarnes, Christopher, M1 aLeavitt, Keith1 aUhlmann, Eric, L  u/biblio/why-so-serious-experimental-and-field-evidence-morality-and-sense-humor-are-psychologically-002061nas a2200205   4500008004100000245012400041210006900165260000900234300001200243490000700255520133100262653001501593100002101608700001901629700002201648700001801670700001801688700002401706856012501730       2012                        eng d00aGetting Explicit about the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for their Use in Organizational Research0 aGetting Explicit about the Implicit A Taxonomy of Implicit Measu  c2012  a553-6010 v153 aAccumulated evidence from social and cognitive psychology suggests that many behaviors are driven by processes operating outside of awareness, and an array of implicit measures to capture such processes have been developed. Despite their potential application, implicit measures have received relatively modest attention within the organizational sciences, due in part to barriers to entry and uncertainty about appropriate use of available measures. The current paper is intended to serve as an implicit measurement “toolkit” for organizational scholars, and as such our goals are fourfold. First, we present theory critical to implicit measures, highlighting advantages of capturing implicit processes in organizational research. Second, we present a functional taxonomy of implicit measures (i.e., accessibility-based, association-based, and interpretation-based measures) and explicate assumptions and appropriate use of each. Third, we discuss key criteria to help researchers identify specific implicit measures most appropriate for their own work, including a discussion of principles for the psychometric validation of implicit measures. Fourth, we conclude by identifying avenues for impactful “next generation” research within the organizational sciences that would benefit from the use of implicit measures.10aManagement1 aUhlmann, Eric, L1 aLeavitt, Keith1 aMenges, Jochen, I1 aKoopman, Joel1 aHowe, Michael1 aJohnson, Russell, E  u/biblio/getting-explicit-about-implicit-taxonomy-implicit-measures-and-guide-their-use-0