00508nas a2200145   4500008004100000245005500041210005500096260003000151653001700181653001400198100002300212700001600235700001700251856009400268       2023                        eng d00aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization0 aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization  aStorrs, Connecticutc202310aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/morality-appraisals-consumer-responsibilization-000380nas a2200109   4500008004100000245004700041210004700088260002300135653001700158100001700175856007800192       2023                        eng d00aResilient Teaching in an Era of Disruption0 aResilient Teaching in an Era of Disruption  aSterling, VAc202310aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/resilient-teaching-era-disruption00470nas a2200157   4500008004100000245005800041210005400099260000900153300001200162490000700174653001700181100001500198700002300213700001700236856005900253       2022                        eng d00aThe Changing Faces of Business Law and Sustainability0 aChanging Faces of Business Law and Sustainability  c2022  a613-6200 v5910aBusiness Law1 aCahoy, Dan1 aPark, Stephen, Kim1 aScott, Inara  uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ablj.1221300598nas a2200145   4500008004100000245010900041210006900150260000900219653001700228653001400245100002300259700001600282700001700298856013700315       2022                        eng d00aThe (Ir)Responsible American Consumer:  Examining Morality and Responsibilization for Armed Self-Defense0 aIrResponsible American Consumer Examining Morality and Responsib  c202210aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/irresponsible-american-consumer-examining-morality-and-responsibilization-armed-self-defense01719nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007700041210006900118260000900187520119300196653001701389100001701406700002101423700001601444856011301460       2022                        eng d00aRevisiting Meriwether v. Hartop and Academic Freedom in Higher Education0 aRevisiting Meriwether v Hartop and Academic Freedom in Higher Ed  c20223 aAlthough the nature and extent of academic freedom has been subject to analysis for over a century, recent developments underscore the need to reconsider the proper scope of academic freedom. These developments include Meriwether v. Hartop, a 2021 Sixth Circuit decision in which a professor claimed a Constitutional right, based in academic freedom, to refuse to use a student’s pronouns; the growing science of pedagogy and understanding of how students learn; and the changing role of higher education in the United States. We propose updated factors for assessing the scope of academic freedom that balance the interests of the university, individual faculty members, students, and the general public. In doing so, we specifically address and discuss the interest of the state in delivering an “effective education”—a concept that we ground in both the literature of constitutional rights and also the literature of effective pedagogy, linking the interest of the state in delivering effective learning experiences to the science of teaching and learning. We also address the need for the recognition of gender pronouns and the potential for harm when they are not recognized.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBrown, Elizabeth1 aYordy, Eric  u/biblio/revisiting-meriwether-v-hartop-and-academic-freedom-higher-education00650nas a2200121   4500008004100000245008300041210006900124260000900193520017200202653001700374100001700391856012000408       2021                        eng d00aAs in-person classes resume, colleges shouldn't lose steam on faculty training0 aAs inperson classes resume colleges shouldnt lose steam on facul  c20213 aProfessional development in pedagogy should be required when instructors enter the institution and at intervals after that, one dean of teaching and learning explains.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttps://www.highereddive.com/news/as-in-person-classes-resume-colleges-shouldnt-lose-steam-on-faculty-train/598129/01162nas a2200145   4500008004100000245009200041210006900133260000900202300001000211490000700221520064100228653001700869100001700886856011300903       2021                        eng d00aLearning to "Think Like a Lawyer": Developing a Metacognitive Model for Legal Reasoning0 aLearning to Think Like a Lawyer Developing a Metacognitive Model  c2021  a34-420 v693 aIn the area of law, metacognition is an implicit goal of instruction, as legal studies classes often stress learning to “think like a lawyer.” However, the explicit metacognitive model for using legal reasoning to break down complex problems and seek solutions is rarely identified. This article explicitly identifies the metacognitive model for thinking like a lawyer and provides concrete steps for direct instruction in this method of analysis. The method of analysis and the resulting model are useful to beyond the legal studies classroom, as the legal reasoning model is substantially similar to a model for critical thinking.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/learning-think-lawyer-developing-metacognitive-model-legal-reasoning01457nas a2200169   4500008004100000245007100041210006900112260000900181300001100190490000700201520089800208653001701106100001701123700002101140700001601161856011001177       2020                        eng d00aR Corps: When Should Corporate Values Receive Religious Protection0 aR Corps When Should Corporate Values Receive Religious Protectio  c2020  a91-1330 v173 aIn this article, we explain how a corporation might invoke religious freedom claims in order to protect corporate values such as diversity, equality, sanctuary, or women’s access to reproductive care which are not exclusively associated with a religion, and are often held by secular entities. In order to do so, we must address the following unresolved legal issues: 1) How can one define whether a set of beliefs are “religious” when those beliefs are held not just by a single individual, but by a diverse collection of individuals? 2) Does the meaning of religion change when it is no longer exercised by a human being but instead by a corporation? 3) Importantly, how would a court evaluate the religious claims of a business entity made up of diverse owners, members, and/or shareholders? And 4) What are the broader consequences, benefits and detriments of protecting such claims?10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBrown, Elizabeth1 aYordy, Eric  u/biblio/r-corps-when-should-corporate-values-receive-religious-protection01999nas a2200145   4500008004100000245009300041210006900134260000900203300001200212490000700224520146600231653001701697100001701714856012201731       2020                        eng d00aThe Trouble with Boycotts: Are Fossil Fuel Divest Campaigns Unlawful Concerted Activity?0 aTrouble with Boycotts Are Fossil Fuel Divest Campaigns Unlawful   c2020  a53775910 v573 aOrganizations like 350.org, Insure Our Future, and DivestInvest are leading campaigns to urge boycott and divestment from fossil fuels as a means to address climate change. Increasingly, they are finding success, from individual consumers to massive pension and sovereign wealth funds. However, as organized group boycotts, divest campaigns may be vulnerable to prosecution under antitrust law. This article explores the likelihood of success in such a case, considering the history of the legal treatment of organized boycotts, the scope and purpose of antitrust law, and the possible application of the First Amendment to the divestment context. The article finds that fossil fuel boycotts straddle a number of contradictory characteristics, making application of existing theories inadequate. In particular, existing precedent protects political boycotts, but not those with primarily economic objectives, and fails to definitively address whether a noncompetitive actor may undertake concerted action under antitrust law. In the context of climate change, where the political is economic, and political goals may seek significant economic changes (such as undermining an entire industry), existing theories may lead to a result that threatens both free expression and the health of the planet. The essential flexibility of the Sherman Act, however, provides room for protection of political activity, even where the ultimate objective is economic in nature.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/trouble-boycotts-are-fossil-fuel-divest-campaigns-unlawful-concerted-activity00545nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260002700182653001700209653001400226100002300240700001600263700001700279856010300296       2019                        eng d00aAmerican Consumers' Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms0 aAmerican Consumers Understandings of the Right to Consume Firear  aMontreal, Canadac201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/american-consumers-understandings-right-consume-firearms-000525nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260000900182653001700191653001400208100002300222700001600245700001700261856010100278       2019                        eng d00aAmerican Consumers' Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms0 aAmerican Consumers Understandings of the Right to Consume Firear  c201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/american-consumers-understandings-right-consume-firearms00533nas a2200145   4500008004100000245008200041210006900123260000900192300001100201490000700212653001700219100001700236700002100253856011300274       2019                        eng d00aBelief v. Belief: Resolving LGBTQ Rights Conflicts in the Religious Workplace0 aBelief v Belief Resolving LGBTQ Rights Conflicts in the Religiou  c2019  a55-1130 v5610aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBrown, Elizabeth  u/biblio/belief-v-belief-resolving-lgbtq-rights-conflicts-religious-workplace01008nas a2200157   4500008004100000245003400041210003200075260002700107300001600134490000700150520056900157653001700726100001700743700001800760856007200778       2019                        eng d00aEnvironmental Law. Disrupted.0 aEnvironmental Law Disrupted  aWashington, D.C.c2019  a10038-100630 v493 aThe U.S. regulatory environment is changing rapidly, at the same time that visible and profound impacts of climate change are already being felt throughout the world, and enormous, potentially existential threats loom in the not-so-distant future. What does it mean to think about and practice environmental law in this setting? In this Article, members of the Environmental Law Collaborative have taken on the question of whether environmental law as we currently know it is up to the job of addressing these threats, and, if not, what the path forward should be.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aTakacs, David  uhttps://elr.info/news-analysis/49/10038/environmental-law-disrupted00611nas a2200145   4500008004100000245012500041210006900166260000900235653001700244653001400261100002300275700001600298700001700314856013400331       2019                        eng d00aRelating American's Responses to the Marketization of Armed Self-Defense to their Understandings of the Second Amendment0 aRelating Americans Responses to the Marketization of Armed SelfD  c201910aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/relating-americans-responses-marketization-armed-self-defense-their-understandings-second00323nas a2200109   4500008004100000245002500041210002500066260002300091653001700114100001700131856006500148       2018                        eng d00aEnvironmental Policy0 aEnvironmental Policy  aNew York, NYc201810aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/environmental-policy01060nas a2200157   4500008004100000245009900041210006900140260000900209300001200218490000700230520047100237653001700708100003000725700001700755856013000772       2018                        eng d00aRedefining Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Globalization and Regulatory Hardening0 aRedefining Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Globaliz  c2018  a167-2180 v553 aThrough our analysis of corporate trends, regulations, and case law from the United States, European Union, China, and India, we argue that the process of legalization and redefinition of CSR through a shareholder primacy lens may, troublingly, undermine the very notion of corporate social responsibility. In the face of these trends, this article redefines CSR with a reference to a fresh commitment to corporations’ social and ethical responsibility to society.10aBusiness Law1 aBerger-Walliser, Gerlinde1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/redefining-corporate-social-responsibility-era-globalization-and-regulatory-hardening01208nas a2200157   4500008004100000245007500041210006900116260002700185300001400212490000700226520065600233653001700889100001700906700002100923856010600944       2018                        eng d00aSanctuary Corporations: Time for Liberal Corporations to Get Religion?0 aSanctuary Corporations Time for Liberal Corporations to Get Reli  aPhiladelphia, PAc2018  a1102-11440 v203 aSpurred on by the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation policies, the “sanctuary” movement has seen rapid growth in both religious and secular contexts. Some businesses have publicly expressed their support for undocumented people, but what happens if these businesses run afoul of immigration laws? Following the logic of Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, we argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could provide a shield for businesses, provided they act out of a sincere religious belief. We also discuss the heightened role of religion in today’s legal landscape, and how this may ultimately be a dangerous result for civil society.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBrown, Elizabeth  u/biblio/sanctuary-corporations-time-liberal-corporations-get-religion00521nas a2200133   4500008004100000245009100041210006900132260000900201300001200210490000600222653001700228100001700245856012500262       2018                        eng d00aUtilizing Energy and Environmental Law: Focus on Innovation, Creativity, and Economics0 aUtilizing Energy and Environmental Law Focus on Innovation Creat  c2018  a557-5640 v410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/utilizing-energy-and-environmental-law-focus-innovation-creativity-and-economics00529nas a2200109   4500008004100000245012200041210006900163260002300232653001700255100001700272856013000289       2018                        eng d00aWhen Values Collide: The Complex Interaction of Free Expression, RFRA, and the Fourteenth Amendment in the Workplace0 aWhen Values Collide The Complex Interaction of Free Expression R  aMonterey, CAc201810aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/when-values-collide-complex-interaction-free-expression-rfra-and-fourteenth-amendment00546nas a2200169   4500008004100000245007800041210006900119260000900188300001000197490000700207653001500214653001700229100002000246700001800266700001700284856007500301       2017                        eng d00aBeyond Budgeting: Distinguishing Modes of Adaptive Performance Management0 aBeyond Budgeting Distinguishing Modes of Adaptive Performance Ma  c2017  a33-530 v2910aAccounting10aBusiness Law1 aO'Grady, Winnie1 aAkroyd, Chris1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/S1474-78712017000002900300309nas a2200109   4500008004100000245002100041210002100062260002100083653001700104100001700121856006100138       2017                        eng d00aClean Power Plan0 aClean Power Plan  aEugene, ORc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/clean-power-plan00492nas a2200109   4500008004100000245009200041210006900133260002700202653001700229100001700246856011900263       2017                        eng d00aCorporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Legalization: An International Perspective0 aCorporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Legalization An Int  aPalm Springs, CAc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/corporate-social-responsibility-era-legalization-international-perspective01146nas a2200301   4500008004100000245005000041210004800091260000900139300001600148490000700164520030800171653001700479100001700496700002000513700002500533700001900558700002000577700001900597700001900616700002000635700002100655700002500676700001300701700001700714700001800731710001800749856007700767       2017                        eng d00aEnergy Policy: No Place for Zero-Sum Thinking0 aEnergy Policy No Place for ZeroSum Thinking  c2017  a10328-103510 v473 aEnvironmental law and environmental protection are often portrayed as requiring trade offs: “jobs versus environment,” “markets versus regulation,” “enforcement versus incentives.” The authors explore the meaning and the role of zero-sum environmentalism as a first step in moving beyond it.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBaker, Shalanda1 aCraig, Robin, Kundis1 aDernbach, John1 aHirokawa, Keith1 aKrakoff, Sarah1 aOwley, Jessica1 aPowers, Melissa1 aRoesler, Shannon1 aRosenbloom, Jonathan1 aRuhl, JB1 aSalzman, Jim1 aTakacs, David1 aEmptyAuthNode  uhttps://elr.info/news-analysis/47/10328/beyond-zero-sum-environmentalism00392nas a2200109   4500008004100000245005000041210004800091260002400139653001700163100001700180856008500197       2017                        eng d00aEnergy Policy: No Place for Zero-Sum Thinking0 aEnergy Policy No Place for ZeroSum Thinking  aWashington DCc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/energy-policy-no-place-zero-sum-thinking00366nas a2200109   4500008004100000245003900041210003900080260002400119653001700143100001700160856007900177       2017                        eng d00aImplicit Bias and Higher Education0 aImplicit Bias and Higher Education  aCorvallis, ORc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/implicit-bias-and-higher-education00642nas a2200169   4500008004100000245008600041210006900127260002200196653001700218100001700235700002000252700002200272700001700294700002200311700002000333856011900353       2017                        eng d00aLaw, Management, and Strategy: Collapsing Boundaries and Managing the Interstices0 aLaw Management and Strategy Collapsing Boundaries and Managing t  aAtlanta, GAc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aSulkowski, Adam1 aBagley, Constance1 aNelson, J.S.1 aShrivastava, Paul1 aWaddock, Sandra  u/biblio/law-management-and-strategy-collapsing-boundaries-and-managing-interstices00536nas a2200109   4500008004100000245012200041210006900163260002200232653001700254100001700271856013800288       2017                        eng d00aLegislation and Response: Understanding the Role of the Individual in  Implementing Social Change Legislation at Work0 aLegislation and Response Understanding the Role of the Individua  aAtlanta, GAc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/legislation-and-response-understanding-role-individual-implementing-social-change-legislation00833nas a2200121   4500008004100000245004200041210004200083260002000125520045800145653001700603100001700620856007400637       2017                        eng d00aOff Grid Solar and the Global Compact0 aOff Grid Solar and the Global Compact  aSheffieldc20173 aIn remote rural areas, off-grid solar lighting may be the first step on a path to education and sustainable growth. However, serving this market can be difficult for established businesses accustomed to working in developed markets. This chapter offers research-based insight into the best practices for operating in subsistence markets, with a particular emphasis on how these practices are implemented by enterprises providing off-grid solar lighting.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/grid-solar-and-global-compact01416nas a2200157   4500008004100000245005400041210005400095260000900149300001200158490000700170520098200177653001701159100001701176700002101193856004401214       2017                        eng d00aRedefining and Regulating the New Sharing Economy0 aRedefining and Regulating the New Sharing Economy  c2017  a553-7510 v193 aWhile proponents of regulating the sharing economy suggest a need to protect public health, workers, and incumbent businesses, to ensure localities are made whole for the use of public services, opponents of regulation argue that government intervention will stifle innovation and undermine economic and community benefits. The problem with both sides of this argument is that advocates and detractors alike often fail to address the wide differences among the practices and business entities that currently fall under the same umbrella. To address this inappropriate conflation and the resulting confusion among consumers and regulators alike, the goal of this article is to define the sharing economy as it now stands and to create a taxonomy that distinguishes and differentiates the various types of business entities that have been lumped into it. This article then proposes regulatory responses to the differing categories in the taxonomy based on the risks they present.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBrown, Elizabeth  uhttps://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/jbl/00550nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009900041210006900140260002300209653001700232100001700249700003000266856013200296       2017                        eng d00aRedefining Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Globalization and Regulatory Hardening0 aRedefining Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Globaliz  aSavannah, GAc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBerger-Walliser, Gerlinde  u/biblio/redefining-corporate-social-responsibility-era-globalization-and-regulatory-hardening-000499nas a2200121   4500008004100000245007400041210006900115260002400184653001700208100001700225700003000242856010500272       2017                        eng d00aRedesigning Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Legalization0 aRedesigning Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Legaliz  aVancouver, BCc201710aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBerger-Walliser, Gerlinde  u/biblio/redesigning-corporate-social-responsibility-era-legalization00548nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007100041210006700112260003100179653001500210653001700225100001800242700002000260700001700280856010500297       2016                        eng d00aAn adaptive management model: A beyond budgeting informed approach0 aadaptive management model A beyond budgeting informed approach  aMelbourne, Australiac201610aAccounting10aBusiness Law1 aAkroyd, Chris1 aO'Grady, Winnie1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/adaptive-management-model-beyond-budgeting-informed-approach01846nas a2200145   4500008004100000245007800041210006900119260002100188300001100209490000700220520137200227653001701599100001701616856006701633       2016                        eng d00aAntitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration: A Chilling Combination?0 aAntitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration A Chilling Comb  aMalden, MAc2016  a97-1440 v533 aBusinesses are increasingly using collaboration to address concerns about sustainability, transparency, human rights, and labor conditions in global markets. Such collaborations include the development of certifications and standards, the sharing of information about factories and suppliers, and agreements to share facilities, like less than full delivery trucks. Yet at the same time, federal antitrust policies broadly prohibit agreements that restrain trade or commerce, creating the potential for innovative collaborations to result in legal prosecution. This article applies antitrust law to socially responsible and sustainable business collaboration in an effort to determine whether antitrust law chills potentially beneficial agreements. The article concludes that careful structuring of agreements can avoid many antitrust violations, but also finds that certain types of agreements, including those that could have the most impact on scarce resources and vulnerable commodity producers, are forbidden. Accordingly, this article argues that per se rules forbidding certain practices, including price fixing and resource sharing, be reconsidered in light of current economic and environmental conditions. It also questions certain assumptions about the benefits of competition in light of current environmental, human rights, and sustainability challenges.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ablj.12073/abstract00594nas a2200145   4500008004100000245009200041210006900133260003100202653001500233653001700248100001800265700002000283700001700303856012800320       2016                        eng d00aBeyond budgeting and management change: Responding flexibly to environmental turbulence0 aBeyond budgeting and management change Responding flexibly to en  aMonterey, Californiac201610aAccounting10aBusiness Law1 aAkroyd, Chris1 aO'Grady, Winnie1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/beyond-budgeting-and-management-change-responding-flexibly-environmental-turbulence01410nas a2200145   4500008004100000245010700041210006900148260000900217300001000226490000700236520091600243653001701159100001701176856007101193       2016                        eng d00aA business model for success: Enterprises serving the base of the pyramid with off-grid solar lighting0 abusiness model for success Enterprises serving the base of the p  c2016  a50-550 v703 aBasic electric service is essential to sustainable development, yet for remote rural areas, connecting to an electric grid can be economically and geographically unfeasible. Firms have sought to bring basic electric service to isolated and impoverished rural areas using off-grid solar lights and solar home systems, but often meet challenges common to base of the pyramid (BOP) markets. This article examines the intersection of theories related to successful business models for enterprises serving the base of the pyramid and studies of off-grid renewable energy enterprises. It identifies relevant and overlapping themes, and creates a framework for a successful business model that includes four primary components: community interaction; partnerships; local capacity building; and addressing barriers unique to the off-grid market, including financing, education, and development of distribution networks.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211630931501409nas a2200157   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260000900212300001200221490000700233520091300240653001701153100001601170700001601186856004901202       2016                        eng d00aData Analytics and Consumer Profiling: Finding Appropriate Privacy Principles for Discovered Data0 aData Analytics and Consumer Profiling Finding Appropriate Privac  c2016  a696-7140 v323 aIn Big Data, the application of sophisticated data analytics to very large datasets makes it possible to infer or derive (“to discover”) additional personal information about consumers that would otherwise not be known from examining the underlying data. The discovery and use of this type of personal information for consumer profiling raises significant information privacy concerns, challenging privacy regulators around the globe. This article finds appropriate privacy principles to protect consumers’ privacy in this context. It draws insights from a comparative law study of information privacy laws in the United States and Australia. It examines draft consumer privacy legislation from the United States to reveal its strengths and weaknesses in terms of addressing the significant privacy concerns that relate to Big Data’s discovery of personal data and subsequent profiling by businesses.10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aForder, Jay  uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.00201874nas a2200145   4500008004100000245010100041210006900142260002400211300001200235490000600247520140800253653001701661100001701678856003301695       2016                        eng d00aIncentive Regulation, New Business Models, and the Transformation of the Electric Power Industry0 aIncentive Regulation New Business Models and the Transformation   aAnn Arbor, MIc2016  a319-3700 v53 aThe electric utility sector is in the midst of paradigmatic change. Market forces include decreased load growth and technological advances in distributed energy resources, alongside pressures for decarbonization and demands for increased efficiency and new utility services. Meanwhile, as the utility monopoly is undermined and profits slow, financial analysts signal increasing risk to potential utility investors. Suggestions for changes to the existing regulatory structure abound. At the broadest level, the changes that have been proposed reflect an established divide between energy policy, which traditionally focuses on economics and markets, and environmental law, which is based in the protection of natural resources and ecosystems. This article: 1) identifies regulatory and economic incentives embedded in the current utility system; 2) assesses current market trends and new utility goals; and 3) analyzes the intersection of embedded regulatory incentives and key proposals for regulatory changes in light of the new goals. It finds that proposals for changes to the regulatory structure often fail to account for existing regulatory incentives, and ignore opportunities to use regulatory incentives to modify and incentivize desired utility behavior. It concludes with recommendations for ways to incorporate incentive-based regulation in proposals for new utility regulatory structures.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://www.mjeal-online.org/00416nas a2200121   4500008004100000245004500041210004400086260003100130653001700161100001600178700001600194856008400210       2016                        eng d00aPrivacy, Consumer Profiling and Big Data0 aPrivacy Consumer Profiling and Big Data  aBloomington, Indianac201610aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aForder, Jay  u/biblio/privacy-consumer-profiling-and-big-data00696nas a2200121   4500008004100000245006000041210005900101260002500160520025600185653001700441100001700458856009900475       2016                        eng d00aPromise and Peril: National Security and Climate Change0 aPromise and Peril National Security and Climate Change  aWashington, DCc20163 aIn this chapter, I explore the national security implications of climate change, with particular attention to the way national security issues may allow for adaptation and mitigation efforts without creating conflict over the source of climate change.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/promise-and-peril-national-security-and-climate-change00527nas a2200109   4500008004100000245011400041210006900155260002800224653001700252100001700269856013100286       2016                        eng d00aToward a Taxonomy of Sharing: Categorizing, Assessing, and Regulating Distinct Aspects of the Sharing Economy0 aToward a Taxonomy of Sharing Categorizing Assessing and Regulati  aSan Francisco, CAc201610aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/toward-taxonomy-sharing-categorizing-assessing-and-regulating-distinct-aspects-sharing00471nas a2200109   4500008004100000245007800041210006900119260002300188653001700211100001700228856011600245       2015                        eng d00aAntitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration: A Chilling Combination?0 aAntitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration A Chilling Comb  aPhiladelphiac201510aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/antitrust-and-socially-responsible-collaboration-chilling-combination-001526nas a2200133   4500008004100000245005400041210005400095260002300149490000700172520108000179653001701259100001701276856009901293       2015                        eng d00aApplying Stakeholder Theory to Utility Regulation0 aApplying Stakeholder Theory to Utility Regulation  aBerkeley, CAc20150 v423 aMany in the energy sector are calling for a transformation of the traditional utility model. However, proposals for “Utility 2.0” typically maintain the bilateral, adversarial relationship between the utility and its regulator. This article posits that one of the key flaws in the U.S. utility regulatory system is this myopic decision-making process, which limits the potential for consideration of stakeholder interests and more comprehensive systems thinking. While expanding the interests considered by utilities and regulators will not solve other problems embedded in traditional utility regulation, a broadening of the consideration of stakeholder interests will almost certainly allow for more comprehensive long-term planning, greater attention to environmental and other stakeholder concerns, and the potential for transformational policy choices. The article therefore offers a new governance structure that would bring stakeholder interests to the regulatory table and allow utilities and regulators to include these interests in key decision-making contexts.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://elq.typepad.com/currents/2015/01/applying-stakeholder-theory-to-utility-regulation.html00504nas a2200109   4500008004100000245009700041210006900138260002900207653001700236100001700253856012400270       2015                        eng d00aIncentive Regulation, Business Models, and the Transformation of the Electric Power Industry0 aIncentive Regulation Business Models and the Transformation of t  aSouth Royalton, VTc201510aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/incentive-regulation-business-models-and-transformation-electric-power-industry00829nas a2200157   4500008004100000245008900041210006900130260000900199300000700208490000700215520033800222653001700560100001700577700001900594856005800613       2015                        eng d00aPlanning for the Future of the Electric Power Sector through Regional Collaboratives0 aPlanning for the Future of the Electric Power Sector through Reg  c2015  a110 v283 aAs it undergoes rapid evolutionary change, the electric power sector has become highly fragmented and complex, with divided responsibilities, lopsided investments, and insufficient coordination to set goals and meet them. The use of regional collaborative governance structures might reimagine the goals and governance of the sector.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aBernell, David  uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1040619001356nas a2200133   4500008004100000245015600041210006900197260000900266520075100275653001701026100002901043700001601072856013401088       2015                        eng d00aPrivacy versus Reward: Do Loyalty Programs Increase Consumers' Willingness to Share Personal Information with Third-party Advertisers and Data Brokers?0 aPrivacy versus Reward Do Loyalty Programs Increase Consumers Wil  c20153 aEmpirical study shows U.S. online shoppers significantly identify third-party advertisers and data brokers as separate agents and display different attitudes toward sharing their PI in the context of online retailing. Applying Westins’ Privacy Segmentation Index, the results showed that enrollment in multiple loyalty programs significantly predicts Privacy Pragmatic shoppers' willingness to share personal information, while consumer commitment significantly increases both the Privacy Unconcerned and Pragmatist groups’ willingness to share. Conversely, this is not the case for Privacy Fundamentalists. Age and gender also played important roles in predicting consumers’ willingness to share their PI with advertisers and data brokers.10aBusiness Law1 aJai, Tun-Min, (Catherine1 aKing, Nancy  u/biblio/privacy-versus-reward-do-loyalty-programs-increase-consumers-willingness-share-personal-000958nas a2200301   4500008004100000245004400041210004200085260002500127300001500152490000700167520013000174653001700304100002700321700002500348700002300373700002500396700002300421700002400444700002500468700002600493700002400519700001900543700002100562700002500583700001700608700001800625856001300643       2015                        eng d00aA Response to the IPCC Fifth Assessment0 aResponse to the IPCC Fifth Assessment  aWashington, DCc2015  a10027100480 v453 aIn this article, the authors respond to various sections of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment.10aBusiness Law1 aAdams-Schoen, Sarah, J1 aBadrinarayana, Deepa1 aCarlarne, Cinnamon1 aCraig, Robin, Kundis1 aDernbach, John, C.1 aHirokawa, Keith, H.1 aKlass, Alexandra, B.1 aKuh, Katrina, Fischer1 aMiller, Stephen, R.1 aOwley, Jessica1 aRoesler, Shannon1 aRosenbloom, Jonathan1 aScott, Inara1 aTakacs, David  uelr.info00487nas a2200109   4500008004100000245008800041210006900129260002100198653001700219100001700236856012400253       2015                        eng d00aSocial enterprise and local entrepreneurship: bringing energy to developing nations0 aSocial enterprise and local entrepreneurship bringing energy to   aStorrs, CTc201510aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/social-enterprise-and-local-entrepreneurship-bringing-energy-developing-nations01165nas a2200157   4500008004100000245007300041210006900114260000900183300001200192490000700204520064200211653001700853100001700870700001600887856010400903       2014                        eng d00a2013 CLSR-LSPI Seminar on Electronic Identity , The Global Challenge0 a2013 CLSRLSPI Seminar on Electronic Identity The Global Challeng  c2014  a112-1250 v303 aI was the sole-author on Section 6 of this article; my section is titled "Linking Offline and Online Identities: Mobility and Identity. I prepared Section 6 of this article for a seminar presented at the 8th international conference on Legal, Security and Privacy Issues in IT law (LSPI), November 2013, Bangkok. Each seminar presenter prepared a draft of their section of the article in advance of the seminar, presented the topic for their section, and prepared a final version of their section of the article. All sections were combined by the Seminar Chair and published in the Computer Law and Security Review as a combined article.10aBusiness Law1 aSaxby, Steve1 aKing, Nancy  u/biblio/2013-clsr-lspi-seminar-electronic-identity-global-challenge00485nas a2200145   4500008004100000245006100041210005700102260000900159300001600168490000700184653001700191100001600208700002400224856009100248       2014                        eng d00aFor Privacy's Sake: Consumer "Opt Outs" for Smart Meters0 aFor Privacys Sake Consumer Opt Outs for Smart Meters  c2014  app. 530-5390 v3010aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, W  u/biblio/privacys-sake-consumer-opt-outs-smart-meters-000506nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260002200212653001700234100001700251856012800268       2014                        eng d00aKeeping the Lights on: Examining and Re-Imagining NLRA Preemption in a Time of Electric Necessity0 aKeeping the Lights on Examining and ReImagining NLRA Preemption   aSeattle, WAc201410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/keeping-lights-examining-and-re-imagining-nlra-preemption-time-electric-necessity-301920nas a2200145   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260002000212300001200232490000700244520136100251653001701612100001701629856012801646       2014                        eng d00aKeeping the Lights On: Examining and Re-Imagining NLRA Preemption in a Time of Electric Necessity0 aKeeping the Lights On Examining and ReImagining NLRA Preemption   aTulsa, OKc2014  a415-4460 v353 aStrikes or lockouts at an electric utility can lead to delayed maintenance in the best case, or blackouts in the worst. In a society dependent on electricity for everything from health care to safe drinking water, a disruption in utility service could cause untold damage. Yet thanks to the expansive doctrine of preemption under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), many public utility commissions (“PUCs”)—the state entities that regulate electric utilities—have concluded that they are prohibited from intervening in labor disputes, even when public safety is threatened. Given the magnitude of harm that could be caused by electric service disruptions, clarification of PUCs’ authority is necessary. This article analyzes the extent to which state agencies retain the power to regulate utilities and protect their citizens, even when their actions may, either directly or indirectly, impact collective bargaining or alter the balance of power between labor and management. The article illustrates the authority of state utility regulators to set service and safety standards, oversee utility staffing, and intervene in labor disputes. In addition, the article proposes a re-thinking of NLRA preemption doctrine as applied to electric utilities, and suggests possible reforms to accommodate the role electricity plays in today’s society.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/keeping-lights-examining-and-re-imagining-nlra-preemption-time-electric-necessity-200507nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260002300212653001700235100001700252856012800269       2014                        eng d00aKeeping the Lights on: Examining and Re-Imagining NLRA Preemption in a Time of Electric Necessity0 aKeeping the Lights on Examining and ReImagining NLRA Preemption   aMonteray, CAc201410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/keeping-lights-examining-and-re-imagining-nlra-preemption-time-electric-necessity-400534nas a2200109   4500008004100000245012200041210006900163260002200232653001700254100001700271856013600288       2014                        eng d00aMandatory Adoption of Stakeholder Review Processes to Improve Sustainability and Responsiveness of Utility Governance0 aMandatory Adoption of Stakeholder Review Processes to Improve Su  aSeattle, WAc201410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/mandatory-adoption-stakeholder-review-processes-improve-sustainability-and-responsiveness-000535nas a2200109   4500008004100000245012700041210006900168260002300237653001700260100001700277856013100294       2014                        eng d00aMandatory Adoption of Stakeholder Review Processes To Improve Sustainability and Certainty of Utility Resource Acquisition0 aMandatory Adoption of Stakeholder Review Processes To Improve Su  aPortland, ORc201410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/mandatory-adoption-stakeholder-review-processes-improve-sustainability-and-certainty-000608nas a2200121   4500008004100000245015600041210006900197260002400266653001700290100002900307700001600336856013400352       2014                        eng d00aPrivacy versus Reward: Do Loyalty Programs Increase Consumers' Willingness to Share Personal Information with Third-party Advertisers and Data Brokers?0 aPrivacy versus Reward Do Loyalty Programs Increase Consumers Wil  aDallas, Texasc201410aBusiness Law1 aJai, Tun-Min, (Catherine1 aKing, Nancy  u/biblio/privacy-versus-reward-do-loyalty-programs-increase-consumers-willingness-share-personal-102288nas a2200157   4500008004100000245015500041210006900196260000900265300001200274490000700286520164400293653001701937100001601954700002501970856013501995       2014                        eng d00aSmart Metering Systems and Data Sharing: Why Getting a Smart Meter Should Also Mean Getting Strong Information Privacy Controls to Manage Data Sharing0 aSmart Metering Systems and Data Sharing Why Getting a Smart Mete  c2014  a215-2530 v223 aSmart meters are being installed in consumers’ homes as the world moves to the smartgrid of intelligent energy networks. Smart meters are near real-time communication devices that can collect and communicate a vast amount of personal data about each customer’s
energy use. Questions about who should have access to such data and for what
purposes raise significant consumer privacy concerns about data sharing. Because data
sharing facilitates secondary uses of energy use data and is essential for third party access
to the data, data sharing is a critical activity that needs to be analysed from an information
privacy perspective. This article makes three important contributions. First,
it identifies the key privacy and data protection concerns for both the EU and USA
consumers related to data sharing in smart metering systems. Second, it provides a
comparison of EU and US privacy and data protection law as it applies to smart metering
systems, revealing gaps in coverage in both systems. Third, it explains how important
privacy concerns related to data sharing are being addressed in the EU and the
USA, including specific examples of legislation and self-regulatory mechanisms that
have been adopted to protect privacy in smart metering systems. From this comparative
analysis, potential privacy-enhancing solutions can be identified. Ultimately it will
be up to government regulators and industry to adopt local solutions, but the goal of
this article is to encourage adoption of regulatory solutions and industry best practices
that are consistent with privacy rights and information privacy principles.
10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, W.  u/biblio/smart-metering-systems-and-data-sharing-why-getting-smart-meter-should-also-mean-getting-001701nas a2200133   4500008004100000245012000041210006900161260002100230490000700251520113900258653001701397100001701414856013601431       2014                        eng d00aTeaching an Old Dog New Tricks: Adapting Public Utility Commissions to Meet Twenty-First Century Climate Challenges0 aTeaching an Old Dog New Tricks Adapting Public Utility Commissio  aBoston, MAc20140 v383 aClimate change and efforts to address it have put the electric utility system under increasing pressure to adapt and evolve. Key to the success of these efforts will be the support of public utility commissions, the state agencies that oversee retail electric utilities. In an effort to determine how these commissions will make decisions, this article explores the history, enabling legislation, and jurisdiction of commissions. It concludes that the authority and purpose of commissions has been narrowly defined to focus almost exclusively on short-term rate impacts to current utility customers, and as a result, efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, modernize or transform the electric grid, or expand the path for new technologies such as electric vehicles, will not come from commissions, and in fact may be blocked by the same. Accordingly, the article offers options for modernization, ultimately recommending a melding of economic and environmental goals through a long-term planning process that balances cost and risk, yet remains squarely within the jurisdiction and historical purpose of the regulatory commission.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/teaching-old-dog-new-tricks-adapting-public-utility-commissions-meet-twenty-first-century-000410nas a2200109   4500008004100000245005400041210005400095260002300149653001700172100001700189856009400206       2013                        eng d00aCreating A 21st Century Public Utility Commission0 aCreating A 21st Century Public Utility Commission  aMonterey, CAc201310aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/creating-21st-century-public-utility-commission-001788nas a2200133   4500008004100000245006200041210006100103260002100164490000800185520132000193653001701513100001701530856010701547       2013                        eng d00aCreating a Twenty-First Century Public Utility Commission0 aCreating a TwentyFirst Century Public Utility Commission  aFresno, CAc20130 vn/a3 aClimate change and efforts to address it have put the electric utility system is under increasing pressure. New policy activities include efforts to increase the penetration of renewable resources, update aging transmission and distribution system infrastructure and transition to a more distributed generation model. Key to the success of these initiatives will be the support of public utility commissions—the state agencies that oversee retail electric utilities. In an effort to determine how these commissions will make decisions, this article explores the history, enabling legislation, and jurisdiction of commissions. It concludes that the authority and purpose of commissions has been narrowly interpreted to focus almost exclusively on short-term rate impacts to utility customers. As a result, efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, modernize or transform the grid, or expand the path for new technologies such as electric vehicles, will not come from commissions, and in fact may be blocked by the same. Accordingly, the article offers options for modernization, ultimately recommending a melding of economic and environmental goals through a long-term planning process that balances cost and risk, yet remains squarely within the jurisdiction and historical purpose of the regulatory commission.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://www.alsb.roundtablelive.org/Resources/Documents/2012-WALSB-Conference%20Registration%20Form.pdf00563nas a2200109   4500008004100000245014500041210006900186260002700255653001700282100001700299856013700316       2013                        eng d00a“Dancing Backward in High Heels": Examining and Addressing the Disparate Regulatory Treatment of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Resources0 aDancing Backward in High Heels Examining and Addressing the Disp  aPalm Springs, CAc201310aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/dancing-backward-high-heels-examining-and-addressing-disparate-regulatory-treatment-energy-001872nas a2200133   4500008004100000245013200041210006900173260005100242490000700293520134700300653001701647100001701664856005701681       2013                        eng d00a"Dancing Backward in High Heels": Examining and Addressing the Disparate Treatment of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Resources0 aDancing Backward in High Heels Examining and Addressing the Disp  aLewis and Clark Law School, Portland, ORc20130 v423 aBoth energy efficiency and renewable resources offer significant benefits to utilities, their customers, and society as a whole. Yet energy efficiency programs face formidable barriers to adoption that renewable resources do not. While both renewable and efficiency resources have received significant funding in recent years, government support for renewables continues to dwarf that for efficiency measures, and regulatory policies consistently discourage utilities from investing in efficiency measures even while they incentivize investment in renewables. This Article examines the parallel development of renewable resource and energy efficiency programs within utilities, compares the differing treatment of each, and offers concrete recommendations for enhancing energy efficiency adoption by modifying existing policies to more closely resemble those applied to renewable resources. The Article concludes that the historic disincentives to implementing efficiency policies can be remedied by: 1) updating ratemaking structures to ensure utilities can recover and earn on efficiency investments; 2) streamlining cost effectiveness tests that presently encourage utilities to underestimate and under-invest in efficiency programs; and 3) addressing market barriers by strengthening consumer incentives and market transformation efforts.10aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  uhttp://law.lclark.edu/law_reviews/environmental_law/00500nas a2200121   4500008004100000245007100041210006900112260002600181653001700207100001600224700003000240856010800270       2013                        eng d00aData sharing in smart metering systems - consumer privacy concerns0 aData sharing in smart metering systems consumer privacy concerns  aAarhus, Denmarkc201310aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, Wegener  u/biblio/data-sharing-smart-metering-systems-consumer-privacy-concerns-001712nas a2200181   4500008004100000245013800041210006900179260001900248300001200267490000700279520102800286653001701314653001901331100001701350700001801367700001601385856012901401       2013                        eng d00aThe Effect of Behavioral Tracking Practices on Consumers' Shopping Evaluations and Repurchase Intention toward Trust Online Retailers0 aEffect of Behavioral Tracking Practices on Consumers Shopping Ev  aElsevierc2013  a901-9090 v293 aThe study applies the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) model and Social Contract Theory to investigate the effect of behavioral practices scenarios (stimulus) on consumers' evaluations of their online shopping experiences (internal organism) and repurchase intention toward online retailers (external response). The findings suggest there is a disconnect between online shoppers and their trusted online retailers regarding the information collected from online shoppers since, currently, sharing of information collected from customers within affiliates or even with third-party companies<br>such as networking advertising associations for secondary uses (e.g. targeted advertising) is a fairly common practice in the marketing field. Left unresolved, this disconnect may undermine consumers' repurchase intention toward the retailers and potentially injure the social contract between retailers and their customers. These findings are significant for the online retailing industry, consumers and public policy makers.<br>10aBusiness Law10aDesign Program1 aJai, Tun-Min1 aBurns, Leslie1 aKing, Nancy  u/biblio/effect-behavioral-tracking-practices-consumers-shopping-evaluations-and-repurchase-000457nas a2200121   4500008004100000245006100041210005700102260002800159653001700187100001600204700002400220856009100244       2013                        eng d00aFor Privacy's Sake: Consumer "Opt Outs" for Smart Meters0 aFor Privacys Sake Consumer Opt Outs for Smart Meters  aBangkok, Thailandc201310aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, W  u/biblio/privacys-sake-consumer-opt-outs-smart-meters-100447nas a2200109   4500008004100000245006500041210006400106260002800170653001700198100001600215856010600231       2013                        eng d00aLinking Offline and Online Identities: Mobility and Identity0 aLinking Offline and Online Identities Mobility and Identity  aBangkok, Thailandc201310aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy  u/biblio/linking-offline-and-online-identities-mobility-and-identity-000495nas a2200109   4500008004100000245009400041210006900135260001700204653001700221100001700238856013000255       2013                        eng d00aTeaching an Old Dog New Tricks: Creating a Twenty-First Century Public Utility Commission0 aTeaching an Old Dog New Tricks Creating a TwentyFirst Century Pu  aBostonc201310aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/teaching-old-dog-new-tricks-creating-twenty-first-century-public-utility-commission-001358nas a2200169   4500008004100000245014100041210006900182260004600251300001200297490000700309520068600316653000801002653001701010100001601027700001501043856013001058       2013                        eng d00aWhat Do They Know About Me In The Cloud? A Comparative Law Perspective On Protecting the Privacy and Security of Sensitive Consumer Data0 aWhat Do They Know About Me In The Cloud A Comparative Law Perspe  aWiley Periodicals, Inc., Malden, MAc2013  a413-4820 v503 aHow much does the cloud know about us? Should we care? In cloud computing, sensitive personal data flows in a global network of internet connected computers, creating attractive targets for hackers, challenging law enforcement and raising concerns about government surveillance. From an information privacy perspective, this article discusses how well the management information systems practices and laws in the United States and Europe protect the privacy and security of sensitive consumer data in the cloud. It examines policies and proposed regulations and makes suggestions for legal reforms in both jurisdictions to protect the privacy and security of sensitive information.10aBIS10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aRaja, V.T.  u/biblio/what-do-they-know-about-me-cloud-comparative-law-perspective-protecting-privacy-and-001334nas a2200169   4500008004100000245008000041210006900121260001700190300001200207490000700219520085600226653000801082653001701090100001601107700001501123856002601138       2012                        eng d00aProtecting the Privacy and Security of Sensitive Customer Data in the Cloud0 aProtecting the Privacy and Security of Sensitive Customer Data i  aOxfordc2012  a308-3190 v283 aThe global ubiquity of cloud computing may expose consumers' sensitive personal data to significant privacy and security threats. A critical challenge for the cloud computing industry is to earn consumers' trust by ensuring adequate privacy and security for sensitive consumer data. Regulating consumer privacy and security also challenges government enforcement of data protection laws that were designed with national borders in mind. From an information privacy perspective, this article analyses how well the regulatory frameworks in place in Europe and the United States help protect the privacy and security of sensitive consumer data in the cloud. It makes suggestions for regulatory reform to protect sensitive infomraiton in cloud computing environments and to remove regulatory constraints that limit the growth of this vibrant new industry.10aBIS10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aRaja, V.T.  uwww.Sciencedirect.com00538nas a2200121   4500008004100000245011200041210006900153260000900222653001700231653001500248100002000263856013300283       2011                        eng d00aIf Japan Signs the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: Real Change or Political Maneuvering?0 aIf Japan Signs the Hague Convention on International Child Abduc  c201110aBusiness Law10aManagement1 aCosta, Jennifer  u/biblio/if-japan-signs-hague-convention-international-child-abduction-real-change-or-political-001260nas a2200145   4500008004100000245011900041210006900160260004800229300001200277490000600289520076100295653001701056100001601073856002501089       2011                        eng d00aWhy Privacy Discussions about Pervasive Online Customer Profiling Should Focus on Expanding Roles of Third-Parties0 aWhy Privacy Discussions about Pervasive Online Customer Profilin  aInterscience Enterprises, Ltd, Genevac2011  a193-2290 v43 aAbstract: Network advertising associations, consumer databases, data mining services and advertising exchanges play important roles in the online behavioural advertising industry. The participation of such third-party businesses in consumer profiling and generating targeted direct marketing communications raises significant consumer privacy and data protection concerns. This article analyzes the regulatory framework s of the European Union and the United States and legal developments on this topic to assess how well consumers’ privacy concerns are being addressed. It then provides recommendations for regulatory reform specific to third-party involvement in the behavioural advertising industry to enhance consumers’ privacy and data protection.10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy  uwww.inderscience.com01498nas a2200157   4500008004100000245015000041210006900191260001700260300001200277490000700289520095500296653001701251100001601268700003001284856002601314       2010                        eng d00aProfiling the Mobile Customer: Is Industry Self-Regulation Adequate to Protect Consumer Privacy When Behavioural Advertisers Target Mobile Users?0 aProfiling the Mobile Customer Is Industry SelfRegulation Adequat  aOxfordc2010  a595-6120 v263 aMobile customers are increasingly confronted with behavioural advertising targeted individually on the basis of profiles generated by applying technologies to mine databases containing personally-identifying or anonymous data. This article is the second in a two part series on “Profiling the Mobile Customer.” The first article identified privacy gaps in the existing regulatory frameworks in the EU and the U.S. that need to be closed to protect consumers’ privacy and personal data.  This second article examines alternative approaches to protect consumers’ privacy that include legislation, industry self-regulation and privacy-enhancing technologies. Concluding that neither industry self-regulation nor available privacy-enhancing technologies will be adequate to close the gap, this article points out important subject matters that need to be fully tackled by regulators in the EU and U.S. and offers suggestions about how to do this.10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, Wegener  uwww.sciencedirect.com01844nas a2200157   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260001700212300001200229490000700241520135400248653001701602100001601619700002501635856002601660       2010                        eng d00aProfiling the Mobile Customer: Privacy Concerns When Behavioural Advertisers Target Mobile Phones0 aProfiling the Mobile Customer Privacy Concerns When Behavioural   aOxfordc2010  a455-4780 v263 aMobile customers are increasingly confronted with behavioural advertising targeted individually on the basis of profiles generated by applying technologies to mine databases containing personally-identifying or anonymous data. This article is Part I of a two part series on “Profiling the Mobile Customer”. Part I answers the questions: “What is profiling in the context of behavioural advertising?” and “How will consumer profiling impact the privacy of mobile customers?”. The article examines the EU and U.S. regulatory frameworks for protecting privacy and personal data in regards to behavioural advertising that targets mobile customers. It identifies potential harms to privacy and personal data related to profiling for behavioural advertising. It evaluates the extent to which the existing regulatory frameworks in the EU and the U.S.provide an adequate level of protection. Consequently, the article identifies the privacy gaps in the regulatory frameworksthat will need to be addressed to adequately protect mobile consumers from profiling by marketers. Part II of Profiling the Mobile Customer that will appear in the next volume of the CLSR. It will discuss whether industry self-regulation or privacy enhancing technologies will be adequate to protect consumer privacy, or rather, whether new legislation will be necessary.10aBusiness Law1 aKing, Nancy1 aJessen, Pernille, W.  uwww.Sciencedirect.com00442nas a2200109   4500008004100000245006900041210006500110260002600175653001700201100001600218856009800234       2006                        eng d00aThe Value of a Liberal Arts Component for Business Law Education0 aValue of a Liberal Arts Component for Business Law Education  aPortland 91����c200610aBusiness Law1 aLykins, Dan  u/biblio/value-liberal-arts-component-business-law-education-000490nas a2200121   4500008004100000245007500041210006900116260000900185653001700194100001700211700002900228856011100257       2004                        eng d00aRequests for Production: Inspections; Physical and Mental Examinations0 aRequests for Production Inspections Physical and Mental Examinat  c200410aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara1 aSandmire, Michael, "Sam"  u/biblio/requests-production-inspections-physical-and-mental-examinations-000508nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260002400212653001700236100001600253856012900269       2003                        eng d00aThe Bush Doctrine of Preemptive War: a Radical Departure from Traditional American Foreign Policy0 aBush Doctrine of Preemptive War a Radical Departure from Traditi  aCorvallis, ORc200310aBusiness Law1 aLykins, Dan  u/biblio/bush-doctrine-preemptive-war-radical-departure-traditional-american-foreign-policy-000469nas a2200109   4500008004100000245008300041210006900124260002400193653001700217100001600234856010900250       2003                        eng d00aA Consideration of the Patriot Act and the Constitutional Separation of Powers0 aConsideration of the Patriot Act and the Constitutional Separati  aCorvallis, ORc200310aBusiness Law1 aLykins, Dan  u/biblio/consideration-patriot-act-and-constitutional-separation-powers-000497nas a2200133   4500008004100000245008300041210006900124260000900193300000600202490000700208653001700215100001700232856011400249       2003                        eng d00aDefining ‘Employee’: Supreme Court Resolves Question in Clackamas v. Wells0 aDefining Employee Supreme Court Resolves Question in Clackamas v  c2003  a70 v3210aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/defining-employee-supreme-court-resolves-question-clackamas-v-wells-000378nas a2200109   4500008004100000245004900041210004800090260000900138653001700147100001700164856008700181       2003                        eng d00aSection of Environment, Energy and Resources0 aSection of Environment Energy and Resources  c200310aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/section-environment-energy-and-resources-000361nas a2200109   4500008004100000245003900041210003800080260002400118653001700142100001600159856007600175       2003                        eng d00aWar, Dissent and the Supreme Court0 aWar Dissent and the Supreme Court  aCorvallis, ORc200310aBusiness Law1 aLykins, Dan  u/biblio/war-dissent-and-supreme-court-000375nas a2200109   4500008004100000245004900041210004800090260000900138653001700147100001700164856008400181       2002                        eng d00aGot Mold? An Introduction to Mold Litigation0 aGot Mold An Introduction to Mold Litigation  c200210aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/got-mold-introduction-mold-litigation-000493nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010000041210006900141260000900210653001700219100001700236856013000253       2001                        eng d00aA Window for Change: Conflicting Ideologies and Legal Reforms in Late Nineteenth-Century 91����0 aWindow for Change Conflicting Ideologies and Legal Reforms in La  c200110aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/window-change-conflicting-ideologies-and-legal-reforms-late-nineteenth-century-oregon00480nas a2200109   4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260000900205653001700214100001700231856012200248       2000                        eng d00aThe Inter-American System of Human Rights: An Effective Means of Environmental Protection?0 aInterAmerican System of Human Rights An Effective Means of Envir  c200010aBusiness Law1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/inter-american-system-human-rights-effective-means-environmental-protection-002006nas a2200157   4500008004000000245005500040210005500095260001800150520150100168653001701669653001401686100002301700700001601723700001701739856009201756       0                           engd00aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization0 aMorality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization  c2023 In Press3 aAbstract: In recent decades, U.S. “pro-gun” lobbying groups, politicians, courts, and market actors have sought to responsibilize U.S. consumers to use firearms to address the societal problem of crime. These responsibilization efforts center an interpretation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms as an entitlement for individuals to engage in armed protection from criminals. Using interview and online discussion data, this research investigates consumers’ responses to responsibilization for this morally fraught set of behaviors, and the role of consumers’ various understandings of the right to bear arms in these responses. Findings show that acceptance of responsibilization is a matter of proportionality; consumers accept responsibilization for a proportion of specific armed protection scenarios and reject it for the remainder. Acceptance is determined by their appraisals of the morality of the responsibilization sub-processes (Giesler & Veresiu 2014). Consumers’ understanding of the constitutional right serves as a heuristic in these appraisals, with some understandings leading consumers to accept responsibilization across a much larger proportion of scenarios than others. Contributions include illustrating response to responsibilization as a proportionality; illuminating consumers’ active role in appraising responsibilizing efforts; and demonstrating how some consumers come to understand a responsibilized behavior as a moral entitlement.<br><br>10aBusiness Law10aMarketing1 aBarnhart, Michelle1 aHuff, Aimee1 aScott, Inara  u/biblio/morality-appraisals-consumer-responsibilization03017nas a2200169   4500008004000000245012900040210006900169260001800238490000700256520235800263653001702621100002002638700001702658700001902675700001502694856013802709       0                           engd00aWatered Down Voices, Watered Down Justice: A Demand for Polycentricism, Demosprudence, and Praxis in WOTUS Regulatory Reform0 aWatered Down Voices Watered Down Justice A Demand for Polycentri  c2021 In Press0 v343 aFor decades, science has demonstrated that discrete populations have been disproportionately forced to suffer the horrors of living in areas contaminated by toxic and hazardous substances. Communities of color, indigenous communities, and other marginalized communities continuously endure the effects of multigenerational water, air, and land pollution. Whether intentionally or not, EPA and regulatory elites have promulgated so-called “neutral rules” that have resulted in a systemic and ever-expanding national environmental caste. For this to end, EPA must stop being a knowing or unknowing participant in regulatory oppression and become an active agent of regulatory change.<br>EPA is required to take environmental justice concerns into account when promulgating new regulations; amplifying the voices of traditionally subordinated affected communities is an essential element of this goal. Nevertheless, EPA lacks a systematic method to incorporate direct outreach to and engagement of impacted communities, and has no detailed outline or specific strategy to ensure that the voices of impacted communities are heard. Thus, the Trump Administration was able to promulgate new regulations related to the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that are likely to have significant negative impacts on water quality, much of which will be borne by disenfranchised communities, while affording those communities little to no voice in the regulatory process.<br>This Article maintains that the Biden EPA should adopt a sociolegal approach, informed by the theoretical principles of polycentrism and demosprudence, to address systematic and decades-long environmental injustices. This approach would help shift and redistribute power from environmental regulatory elites to the people most affected by environmental harms. Using the case study of WOTUS regulatory reform, we argue that the Biden EPA has a perfect opportunity to create a more inclusive regulatory process that expands the power of historically disenfranchised people, while addressing known harms that will result from the current regulations. The Biden EPA could use WOTUS reform to establish a new paradigm for expanding the power of non-elites and create a model for a more equitable form of regulatory decision-making and a more democratic form of governance.10aBusiness Law1 aMcCrory, Martin1 aScott, Inara1 aRaymond, Angie1 aLevy, Paul  u/biblio/watered-down-voices-watered-down-justice-demand-polycentricism-demosprudence-and-praxis-wotus